18+ Responsible gaming Gambling addiction help Gambling Therapy

Information

How We Rank eSports Online Bookmakers

How the order of bookmakers on esportranker is set, what can change it and what cannot.

Last updated
Reading time
4 min read
Table of Content 11
  1. In short
  2. What it means for you
  3. Our Ranking Methodology
  4. What Shapes the Ranking
  5. Internal Ranking System: Maximus
  6. Ongoing Review and Updates
  7. What We Do vs What We Avoid
  8. Our Star Rating System Explained
  9. How Partnerships Fit Into Our Evaluation Process
  10. A Ranking System Built on Trust
  11. Related

In short

  1. Inputs

    Each bookmaker is assessed on markets and odds coverage, usability, payments, licensing, country access and user feedback.

  2. Maximus

    Our internal ranking system combines those inputs with fixed rules, the same for every site.

  3. Editors

    The team rescores a site after verified changes: licence issues, payment problems or unclear terms.

  4. Commission

    We earn affiliate commission from some bookmakers; it does not set the order.

So what

What it means for you

  • Rankings change by country

    The list adapts to what is available where you are, so two readers can see different orders.

  • Check your game

    The overall ranking is site-wide. Our game pages rank the bookmakers tagged with each esport.

  • Odds shown are examples

    Margins on our pages come from example odds until a live odds feed is connected.

Full text

Our Ranking Methodology

Each eSports betting site is handled using the same approach, so listings remain aligned across all markets.

Information is structured in a way that allows for direct comparison, while also accounting for differences between regions, such as market availability or regulatory frameworks. Before anything is finalized, the outcome is reviewed to ensure it reflects accurate and up-to-date information.

This keeps rankings consistent while allowing them to stay relevant within each market.

What Shapes the Ranking

Our rankings reflect how different elements come together within a consistent structure. No single factor defines placement, it’s the overall picture that matters.

Combined Inputs

Each ranking is based on a range of inputs considered together, rather than relying on a single metric.

Market Relevance

Listings are adjusted based on location, availability, and what is accessible within each market.

Comparative Positioning

Betting sites are positioned in relation to others in the same list, ensuring a fair and consistent comparison.

Structural Consistency

The same approach is applied across all rankings, keeping the structure aligned while allowing for market-specific differences.

Internal Ranking System: Maximus

To manage rankings efficiently across our network, we use an internal system called Maximus. It defines how eSports betting sites are compared and positioned, applying the same structure across all rankings rather than relying on manual placement.

The inputs behind these rankings come directly from our evaluation process. Each bookmaker is assessed across key areas such as betting markets and odds coverage, platform usability, payment options, licensing, country access, and user feedback signals. These factors are reviewed within a structured framework, which you can explore in our eSports betting site review process. Together, they form the basis of how each operator is measured.

Maximus processes this information using a fixed set of rules. It considers multiple factors at the same time, ensuring that positioning reflects a combination of offering, accessibility, and overall performance, rather than any single input.

Because the same structure and criteria are applied across all operators, rankings are based on comparable inputs rather than individual preference. This allows us to manage listings across more than 70 local websites in 46 languages, while adapting rankings to reflect what is available and relevant in each market.

What Maximus Does

  • Uses inputs from our bookmakers' evaluation framework
  • Structures information so all sites are assessed on equal terms
  • Applies fixed rules to interpret multiple factors together
  • Determines ranking positions based on combined inputs
  • Adjusts listings depending on location and market availability
  • Maintains consistency across 70+ local websites and multiple languages

Ongoing Review and Updates

Maximus applies rankings based on structured data, but that data is shaped by our editorial work. Our team reviews eSports bookmakers, assigns scores, and revisits them when verified changes occur. When something important is updated, such as licensing, platform changes, or betting conditions, we adjust the score, and Maximus reflects that change in the rankings.

When Rankings Are Reassessed

We step in when verified issues or material changes impact a site’s standing, including:

  • Risks to user safety or trust
  • Licensing issues or regulatory changes
  • Payment disruptions or policy concerns
  • Lack of transparency or unclear terms

What We Do vs What We Avoid

What we do

  • Apply clear evaluation standards consistently
  • Reassess betting sites when verified changes occur
  • Verify licensing and operational information
  • Maintain structured ranking logic across markets
  • Update listings when material details change

What we avoid

  • Adjust rankings based on short-term promotions
  • Overlooking important updates or user concerns
  • Relying solely on marketing claims
  • Promising guaranteed positions
  • Leaving information unreviewed for extended periods

Our Star Rating System Explained

Our team uses a structured star rating system to reflect how each eSports betting site performs in our evaluation. It provides a clear, consistent way to show the overall result of our assessment across all operators. Below is what each score represents within our framework.

  • 10.0: Exceptional long-term stability and compliance record.
  • 9.0: Broad operational reliability across markets.
  • 8.0: Very strong regulatory standing and transparent policies.
  • 7.0: High level of consistency and structured user protection.
  • 6.0: Above-average performance with clear operational stability.
  • 5.0: Strong overall standards with few material concerns.
  • 4.0: Consistent and reliable in most key areas.
  • 3.0: Acceptable performance with room for improvement.
  • 2.0: Meets minimum standards but shows notable limitations.
  • 1.0: Significant weaknesses in reliability, clarity, or user safeguards.

How Partnerships Fit Into Our Evaluation Process

We operate on an affiliate model. This means that we receive compensation when users visit or register with a bookmaker through our links. That revenue allows us to maintain the website and continue producing detailed reviews across different markets. Partnerships also give us structured access to updates, such as changes in licensing, payment methods, or betting terms. We review and verify this information before including it in our content. At the same time, compensation does not determine how we rank operators. The commercial model supports our work, but it does not dictate our evaluations or final scores.

A Ranking System Built on Trust

Our approach is designed to keep rankings accurate, consistent, and up to date. By combining structured systems with ongoing editorial input, we make sure every position reflects current information and clear standards, so you can confidently compare eSports betting sites.

If you want to learn more about who we are and how we work, you can visit our About Us page.

Related